Customers

In production on UK strategic infrastructure.

Multiple schemes in active production on a major UK infrastructure delivery programme, run by a Tier‑1 delivery partner across multi‑period reporting cycles.

Period-over-period movement view showing scheme P-values shifting between reporting cycles
Period-over-period · liveSchemes in motion across reporting cycles — every shift in P-value traced to the change that drove it.
In production

On UK strategic infrastructure.

Risk Studio is in active production on a major UK infrastructure delivery programme, running across multiple schemes through quarterly reporting cycles. Specific scheme names and delivery‑partner brands are reserved for direct conversations under NDA.

Frameworks we run
SOMA QSRA Readiness V2.9DCMA 14-PointCIOB PP21Acumen Fuse SQI

75 checks across four published frameworks. Badges shown are SOMA‑designed monograms representing each public framework, not the standards bodies' own marks. Compare them →

Case brief

An active UK infrastructure delivery programme.

Want the long form? Read the anonymised case brief — 4 weeks to 4 days →

The challenge

A major UK infrastructure delivery programme runs across multiple junctions and bypasses on major UK road infrastructure. Each scheme runs its own quantitative schedule risk analysis. Each is reviewed against different frameworks at different periods. Each must produce defensible outputs for the client, for the assurance team, and increasingly for the regulator.

The legacy workflow ran on Safran round-trips and per-analyst spreadsheets. Validation was manual. Different schemes ended up assessed against different bars. Periods slipped because the toolchain was the bottleneck, not the analysis.

What SOMA Risk Studio delivers

  • One toolkit across multiple schemes — same validators, same Monte Carlo, same deliverables, same audit chain.
  • Multi-framework validation — SOMA QSRA Readiness, DCMA 14-Point, CIOB PP21, Acumen Fuse SQI on every scheme, every period.
  • Excel report (configurable templates) — the team's existing macro-enabled template, populated automatically. Cells hold literal values so SharePoint previews and macros-disabled viewers display correctly.
  • Analyst Briefing PPTX — 12-slide deck with auto-generated speaker notes addressed to the PM, Planner, Risk Manager, RAM and RRM.
  • Audit-replay archive — every run captured. Cryptographic chain. Re-run any historic period byte-identically.

By the numbers

Multiple schemes
live on a UK infrastructure delivery programme
5,869
activities rendered for a representative scheme in Schedule Lens
75 checks
across four frameworks · every scheme · every period
7,000+ tests
automated regression coverage
300+ versions
since first ship · continuous delivery
Period-over-period scheme movement
Movement view · period over periodWhat shifted, what improved, what's new — answered in seconds, not days.
We sit in the same chair as the people who use Risk Studio every day. That's the only reason it works.— Adam O'Neill, founder, SOMA Project Controls
Who uses it

Built for five roles. Each gets what they need.

PM

Project Managers

Headline P50 / P80 dates, mitigation effectiveness, next-period actions. Briefed in plain English in the PPTX deck.

PLN

Planners

Schedule Lens with WBS tree, per-activity diagnostic trace, every check that failed and why. Conversation-ready.

RM

Risk Managers

Tornados, decile attribution, mitigation deltas, the risk register laid out the way they think about it.

RAM

Risk Analysis Managers

Full audit chain, sign-off workflow, multi-user file locks, accept-with-reason workflow.

RRM

Regional Risk Managers

Programme rollup, heat map across schemes, baseline compare. Portfolio-level visibility.

+

Other roles welcome

If your team's roles don't fit this list, tell us about them. We've added briefing audiences before.

Rhythm of an engagement

What changes between periods.

UK infrastructure schemes typically run on a quarterly reporting cadence. Risk Studio is shaped around it. Here's what a period looks like once Risk Studio is in place.

  • Day 1 — fresh XER and updated risk register land. Validator fires automatically; the analyst sees the delta against last period in minutes.
  • Day 2–3 — workshop with the planner inside Schedule Lens. Pinned issues become the agenda. Most close out the same morning.
  • Mid‑period, the Monte Carlo runs against the updated register. P‑values shift, mitigation delta is plotted, decile attribution flags any new tail risks.
  • Day 5 — four deliverables generated automatically and reviewed. Per‑finding accept‑with‑reason where the team needs to override.
  • By the period board, the analyst is ready to brief the PM, Planner, Risk Manager, RAM and RRM — each gets the slide that's written for them.

Read the case brief. Then ask us what we'd run on yours.

Two‑page write‑up on how Risk Studio fits a quarterly reporting cadence on UK infrastructure programmes. What we run, what we deliver, what changes between periods. We'll share it before the call.