SOMA Risk Studio · V2.5.0

Quantitative risk analysis that stands up to scrutiny.

Validate risk inputs against four frameworks. Run Monte Carlo without the Safran round‑trip. Produce a report you can put in front of the client, the regulator, and the assurance team. Same numbers, same day.

SOMA Risk Studio: Weblink deliverable dashboard behind, Schedule Lens diagnostic view in front — one toolkit covering input validation through to client-ready output
Risk Studio · input to deliverableSchedule Lens in front, Weblink dashboard behind — every layer of the workflow on the same audit chain.
60‑second tour

From XER to deliverable, on autoplay.

A working visualisation of the Risk Studio workflow. Want to see it on your own schedule? Book a walkthrough →

A representative sequence built in scalable vector graphics — not a video. Real Risk Studio runs on your data, in your environment.

75
automated checks across four frameworks
4.3 sec
to render 5,869 activities in Schedule Lens
7,000+
automated tests · zero audit errors
V2.5.0
current release · continuous delivery
The problem

QSRA is too important to do this way.

Every QSRA we inherit slows down in the same three places. They cost time the people best placed to fix the schedule can't get back.

01

Spreadsheets that don't validate themselves

Risk registers, three‑point estimates, correlation matrices — entered by hand, silently wrong. Errors don't surface until the model misbehaves.

02

Safran round‑trips that cost days

Build inputs, export, import, run, re‑export, re‑import. Every round‑trip is a chance to break the chain. By the time you're reporting, the schedule has moved on.

03

Frameworks checked manually, inconsistently

DCMA 14‑point, Acumen Fuse, CIOB PP21, SOMA's own readiness checks. Different analysts apply them differently. Different schemes end up assessed against different bars.

The answer

One toolkit. Validate, model, report.

SOMA Risk Studio brings the whole QSRA workflow into one place. Quality checks run as your team works. Monte Carlo runs in‑house using the same industry‑standard methods. Every output traces back to the source row that produced it.

  • Four input lanes — manual entry, paste‑in, standard template, or non‑standard importer.
  • Four validation frameworks running on the same schedule, every time: SOMA QSRA Readiness, DCMA 14‑point, CIOB PP21, Acumen Fuse SQI.
  • In‑house Monte Carlo — Higham PSD repair, NORTA, six distributions, Spearman tornados.
  • Every run produces four deliverables: Excel report, Weblink HTML, PDF and PPTX briefing. Same numbers, byte‑identically reproducible.
Monte Carlo S-curve for a reference scheme, M3 post-mitigation
S-curve · Reference scheme · M3 post-mitigation10,000 iterations. P80 finish at the right of the cumulative curve, with the deterministic baseline plotted underneath.
Try it

Drag a P‑value. See the date.

A live, fabricated example of how Risk Studio surfaces schedule risk. Bring an XER and we'll run it on your data.

P80 · 03 Jan 2028
+114 days from deterministic baseline

Drag the marker, click the curve, or use ← / → keys.

Demo · fabricated data · M3 post‑mitigationReal Risk Studio S‑curves are generated per scheme, per period, from your Safran exports or our in‑house Monte Carlo engine.
Multi-framework validation

75 checks. One dashboard. Each failure traced to a source row.

Pick the framework your client asks for. Or run all four. Every failed check explains why — and points to the exact row, column, or activity that caused it.

Four overlapping lenses (SOMA, DCMA, CIOB, ACU) converging on a single schedule — same data, four perspectives
SOMA
QSRA Readiness V2.9
39 checks

Proprietary. Built from real schemes and real client conversations.

DCMA
14-Point Assessment
14 checks

US DoD industry standard. The default ask from most clients.

CIOB
PP21
12 metrics

Chartered Institute of Building's planning protocol.

ACU
Fuse SQI
10 metrics

Acumen Fuse Schedule Quality Index.

Compare the four frameworks side by side →

Schedule Lens on a representative UK infrastructure scheme
Schedule Lens · live captureClick any bar for the full diagnostic trace — predecessor list, successor list, every check the activity failed.
Schedule Lens

See the schedule you've been asked to defend.

Time-scaled Gantt with hierarchical WBS, critical-path bars, milestone diamonds, open-end markers, dangling outlines, negative-lag flags. Click any activity for the full diagnostic trace — predecessor, successor, every check it failed.

5,869 activities · 4.3 sec
Tested live on a representative UK infrastructure scheme
Defensibility

Built to stand up — to the client, and to the regulator.

Audit-replay archive

Every run is captured with a cryptographic chain. Re‑run any historic period and get byte‑identical outputs. No drift, no excuses.

Per-finding accept workflow

If you need to accept a check failure for a specific scheme, you write the reason. It's stamped to the audit log. Your assurance team sees it. Your regulator sees it.

Traceability to source row

Every output value — every P50, every tornado bar, every band — traces back to the input row, activity ID, or model iteration that produced it.

Multi-user file locks + role identity

HMAC-chained audit log records who did what, when, on which scheme. Concurrent edits are file-locked. No phantom changes.

In production

On UK strategic infrastructure.

Risk Studio is in active production on a major UK infrastructure delivery programme, running across multiple schemes through quarterly reporting cycles. Same toolkit, same frameworks, same audit trail. Specific scheme names and delivery‑partner brands are reserved for direct conversations under NDA.

Abstract map of a UK infrastructure portfolio with live SOMA Risk Studio schemes
SOMA Risk Studio portfolio console on a major UK infrastructure programme
Portfolio console · liveA live portfolio on a major UK infrastructure programme — one toolkit, one audit chain.

Read the customer brief →

Frameworks we run
SOMA QSRA Readiness V2.9DCMA 14-PointCIOB PP21Acumen Fuse SQI

75 checks across four published frameworks. Badges shown are SOMA‑designed monograms representing each public framework, not the standards bodies' own marks. Compare them →

See it on your schemes

Send us an XER and a risk register.

By the end of a 30‑minute call you'll have 75 checks run and a Weblink dashboard generated against your data.

Trust & methodology: how we run the maths · how we handle your data · compare vs Safran, @RISK, Acumen · FAQ