Spreadsheets that don't validate themselves
Risk registers, three‑point estimates, correlation matrices — entered by hand, silently wrong. Errors don't surface until the model misbehaves.
Validate risk inputs against four frameworks. Run Monte Carlo without the Safran round‑trip. Produce a report you can put in front of the client, the regulator, and the assurance team. Same numbers, same day.

A working visualisation of the Risk Studio workflow. Want to see it on your own schedule? Book a walkthrough →
A representative sequence built in scalable vector graphics — not a video. Real Risk Studio runs on your data, in your environment.
Every QSRA we inherit slows down in the same three places. They cost time the people best placed to fix the schedule can't get back.
Risk registers, three‑point estimates, correlation matrices — entered by hand, silently wrong. Errors don't surface until the model misbehaves.
Build inputs, export, import, run, re‑export, re‑import. Every round‑trip is a chance to break the chain. By the time you're reporting, the schedule has moved on.
DCMA 14‑point, Acumen Fuse, CIOB PP21, SOMA's own readiness checks. Different analysts apply them differently. Different schemes end up assessed against different bars.
SOMA Risk Studio brings the whole QSRA workflow into one place. Quality checks run as your team works. Monte Carlo runs in‑house using the same industry‑standard methods. Every output traces back to the source row that produced it.

A live, fabricated example of how Risk Studio surfaces schedule risk. Bring an XER and we'll run it on your data.
Drag the marker, click the curve, or use ← / → keys.
Buy what you need today. The modules you don't need yet sit on the published roadmap — no rip‑and‑replace later.
Input validation, framework checks, Monte Carlo, S‑curves, tornados, narrative reports.
Read the specVisual XER diagnostics on a time‑scaled Gantt. WBS‑aware. Click any activity → drill into the diagnostic trace.
See it moveCost risk register, AACE‑classified estimates, Monte Carlo — lifting today's @RISK workflows in‑house. Advisory pending formal validation.
See the moduleIntegrated cost‑loaded schedule risk modelling. The long‑term Safran replacement.
Roadmap detailWe build the next module from real client conversations. Tell us what's slowing your team down.
Talk to usPick the framework your client asks for. Or run all four. Every failed check explains why — and points to the exact row, column, or activity that caused it.
Proprietary. Built from real schemes and real client conversations.
US DoD industry standard. The default ask from most clients.
Chartered Institute of Building's planning protocol.
Acumen Fuse Schedule Quality Index.

Time-scaled Gantt with hierarchical WBS, critical-path bars, milestone diamonds, open-end markers, dangling outlines, negative-lag flags. Click any activity for the full diagnostic trace — predecessor, successor, every check it failed.
Every run is captured with a cryptographic chain. Re‑run any historic period and get byte‑identical outputs. No drift, no excuses.
If you need to accept a check failure for a specific scheme, you write the reason. It's stamped to the audit log. Your assurance team sees it. Your regulator sees it.
Every output value — every P50, every tornado bar, every band — traces back to the input row, activity ID, or model iteration that produced it.
HMAC-chained audit log records who did what, when, on which scheme. Concurrent edits are file-locked. No phantom changes.
Risk Studio is in active production on a major UK infrastructure delivery programme, running across multiple schemes through quarterly reporting cycles. Same toolkit, same frameworks, same audit trail. Specific scheme names and delivery‑partner brands are reserved for direct conversations under NDA.

75 checks across four published frameworks. Badges shown are SOMA‑designed monograms representing each public framework, not the standards bodies' own marks. Compare them →
By the end of a 30‑minute call you'll have 75 checks run and a Weblink dashboard generated against your data.
Trust & methodology: how we run the maths · how we handle your data · compare vs Safran, @RISK, Acumen · FAQ